<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for DREWspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://drewspective.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://drewspective.com</link>
	<description>controversy by Drew Maughan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 07:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Positive and Negative by Jahmila Rosario</title>
		<link>http://drewspective.com/2011.01/positive-and-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Jahmila Rosario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 07:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewspective.com/?p=1479#comment-493</guid>
		<description>very nicely written. i&#039;ve always thought this. it is so annoying when people claim they are &quot;positive&quot;. it&#039;s more like people delude themselves into trying to act like they are holier than though and never have a negative moment. that is not only complete delusion but stupidity in a pure raw form (lol). some people have more positive moments than others. a lot of that can be fueled by how they think, their upbringing, who they are around, and how they see the world at large. Doesn&#039;t mean they are better people. &quot;Toxic&quot; people just need thought readjustment...

nicely written! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nicely written. i&#8217;ve always thought this. it is so annoying when people claim they are &#8220;positive&#8221;. it&#8217;s more like people delude themselves into trying to act like they are holier than though and never have a negative moment. that is not only complete delusion but stupidity in a pure raw form (lol). some people have more positive moments than others. a lot of that can be fueled by how they think, their upbringing, who they are around, and how they see the world at large. Doesn&#8217;t mean they are better people. &#8220;Toxic&#8221; people just need thought readjustment&#8230;</p>
<p>nicely written! <img src='http://drewspective.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Opinion on the Enlightened Warrior Training Camp by Bintheredundat</title>
		<link>http://drewspective.com/2009.11/an-opinion-on-the-enlightened-warrior-training-camp/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Bintheredundat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewmaughan.com/weblog/?p=753#comment-492</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been there EaglesGift. I suckered into the hype. My advice to anyone looking at Peak Potentials and any of T Harv Eckers programs is to go to a free MMI seminar. What you&#039;ll experience is a whole lot of motivational yammer yammer interspersed with hard sells to sign up for more $2000-$4000 courses. They&#039;ll tell you that you&#039;re doomed to failure if you don&#039;t. They&#039;ll hype these courses up like they&#039;re an essential to life.

I did the Warrior training. For me, it fell far short of the price tag. It didn&#039;t live up to the hype, and was certainly NOT worth the money. Peak Potentials is about 1 thing, and that&#039;s raking in cash. They&#039;re not &#039;enlightened people&#039;, they&#039;re just scammers. There&#039;s nothing you&#039;ll do in Warrior training that you can&#039;t accomplish on your own.

By the way, EaglesGift, you make a pretty poor example of an enlightened warrior. I do know what I&#039;m talking about. AND I can spell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been there EaglesGift. I suckered into the hype. My advice to anyone looking at Peak Potentials and any of T Harv Eckers programs is to go to a free MMI seminar. What you&#8217;ll experience is a whole lot of motivational yammer yammer interspersed with hard sells to sign up for more $2000-$4000 courses. They&#8217;ll tell you that you&#8217;re doomed to failure if you don&#8217;t. They&#8217;ll hype these courses up like they&#8217;re an essential to life.</p>
<p>I did the Warrior training. For me, it fell far short of the price tag. It didn&#8217;t live up to the hype, and was certainly NOT worth the money. Peak Potentials is about 1 thing, and that&#8217;s raking in cash. They&#8217;re not &#8216;enlightened people&#8217;, they&#8217;re just scammers. There&#8217;s nothing you&#8217;ll do in Warrior training that you can&#8217;t accomplish on your own.</p>
<p>By the way, EaglesGift, you make a pretty poor example of an enlightened warrior. I do know what I&#8217;m talking about. AND I can spell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Do Women Still Choose To Run Away? by Drew</title>
		<link>http://drewspective.com/2012.02/why-do-women-still-choose-to-run-away/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 13:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewspective.com/?p=2484#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your response! You&#039;ve made some very good points, particularly the &quot;I&#039;ve had enough&quot; scenario: it&#039;s a good reminder that running away is sometimes a last resort, and may even be necessary.
I generally think that, although there are certainly issues with upbringing - and let&#039;s not discount the idea that some people don&#039;t know how to handle certain issues, because they were never taught how to -  the decision to run away from situations is more to do with personal choice - especially if we consider &lt;i&gt;how&lt;/i&gt; they run away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your response! You&#8217;ve made some very good points, particularly the &#8220;I&#8217;ve had enough&#8221; scenario: it&#8217;s a good reminder that running away is sometimes a last resort, and may even be necessary.<br />
I generally think that, although there are certainly issues with upbringing &#8211; and let&#8217;s not discount the idea that some people don&#8217;t know how to handle certain issues, because they were never taught how to &#8211;  the decision to run away from situations is more to do with personal choice &#8211; especially if we consider <i>how</i> they run away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Do Women Still Choose To Run Away? by Ambiguous User</title>
		<link>http://drewspective.com/2012.02/why-do-women-still-choose-to-run-away/comment-page-1/#comment-472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambiguous User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drewspective.com/?p=2484#comment-472</guid>
		<description>I totally and wholeheartedly agree with you. Western (USA American) women seem to ALWAYS run away, be it literally or figuratively.

My guesses are (currently):

Pity/sympathy trying to &quot;spare your feelings&quot;, trying to &quot;be the better man (woman)&quot; by walking away;

Preventing their animal/carnal instincts from taking over and them beating the tar out of you or verbally tearing you to shreds;

Complete and abject irrational fear/terror;

Cowardice;

Confusion/ignorance/obliviousness and because of that knowing absolutely nothing about what next to do: so they run;

The notion that if you &quot;run away&quot; you &quot;win&quot; the argument (when in fact you lose and everybody loses, because you&#039;re (the woman) just stewing in your own anger, and becoming more sequestered in your own emotions to &quot;make you think you&#039;re right&quot; rather than rationally dissecting your emotional state of mind and wordings/mental twistings.

And finally, the &quot;I&#039;ve had enough&quot; response, and the only recourse is to leave, because the other person is being irrational, or the first person is becoming emotional and knows that they can&#039;t possibly contribute rationally to the conversation anymore (truly in this case, at least ONE or both parties are behaving wrongly-- but I find this one to be the most common, and potentially added onto by the previous cases simultaneously).

Thanks for listening; I love that more people are coming out about this, after how long? It&#039;s been like 20 years since the Internet&#039;s been around, and finally women are getting their &#039;argumentative failure&#039; picked on in the USA. Or ... we&#039;ve been censored by anti-male anti-men anti-Christ spirits who control ALL the &quot;moderation&quot; (censorship: &quot;sexist&quot;) powers of the Internet? Who&#039;s to know: keep watching this and other posts, LOL.

Ambiguous User


P.S.: I was actively avoiding this, because I think it&#039;s generally either not true, or overridable by upbringing: alternate biological explanations is that they are the gatherer of the hunter/gatherer group, and gatherers Run Away, or they get eaten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally and wholeheartedly agree with you. Western (USA American) women seem to ALWAYS run away, be it literally or figuratively.</p>
<p>My guesses are (currently):</p>
<p>Pity/sympathy trying to &#8220;spare your feelings&#8221;, trying to &#8220;be the better man (woman)&#8221; by walking away;</p>
<p>Preventing their animal/carnal instincts from taking over and them beating the tar out of you or verbally tearing you to shreds;</p>
<p>Complete and abject irrational fear/terror;</p>
<p>Cowardice;</p>
<p>Confusion/ignorance/obliviousness and because of that knowing absolutely nothing about what next to do: so they run;</p>
<p>The notion that if you &#8220;run away&#8221; you &#8220;win&#8221; the argument (when in fact you lose and everybody loses, because you&#8217;re (the woman) just stewing in your own anger, and becoming more sequestered in your own emotions to &#8220;make you think you&#8217;re right&#8221; rather than rationally dissecting your emotional state of mind and wordings/mental twistings.</p>
<p>And finally, the &#8220;I&#8217;ve had enough&#8221; response, and the only recourse is to leave, because the other person is being irrational, or the first person is becoming emotional and knows that they can&#8217;t possibly contribute rationally to the conversation anymore (truly in this case, at least ONE or both parties are behaving wrongly&#8211; but I find this one to be the most common, and potentially added onto by the previous cases simultaneously).</p>
<p>Thanks for listening; I love that more people are coming out about this, after how long? It&#8217;s been like 20 years since the Internet&#8217;s been around, and finally women are getting their &#8216;argumentative failure&#8217; picked on in the USA. Or &#8230; we&#8217;ve been censored by anti-male anti-men anti-Christ spirits who control ALL the &#8220;moderation&#8221; (censorship: &#8220;sexist&#8221;) powers of the Internet? Who&#8217;s to know: keep watching this and other posts, <acronym title="Laughing out loud">LOL</acronym>.</p>
<p>Ambiguous User</p>
<p>P.S.: I was actively avoiding this, because I think it&#8217;s generally either not true, or overridable by upbringing: alternate biological explanations is that they are the gatherer of the hunter/gatherer group, and gatherers Run Away, or they get eaten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

